Home | Bioassessment | Water Quality | Mining | Instream Flow | T&E Species | Lakes | Publications | About Us | Helpful Sites | Laboratory |

Bioassessment

  • Upstream vs. downstream studies
  • Comparisons to regional reference condition
  • Attainment of state biological criteria
  • Attainment of site-specific biological criteria
Aquatic biological assessment is determining the health or integrity of a water-body by evaluating the aquatic community. The aquatic community is compared to what would be expected at a similar site that is not stressed. Biological assessments can be performed using fish, macroinvertebrate, or periphyton assemblages, or any combination of the three.

The simplest form of biological assessment is the traditional upstream vs. downstream approach. Biological data is collected both upstream and downstream of a potential source of stress. The site downstream of the potential source of stress is compared to the upstream site. In this type of biological assessment, differences between upstream and downstream sites may be attributed to the source of concern.

Another type of biological assessment is comparing the biological community of the site or sites of concern to a regional reference condition. The regional reference condition refers to the “expected” aquatic community that is obtained by collecting biological community data from areas free of major anthropogenic influences. Reference conditions may be developed on a relatively small scale (e.g., several sites within a watershed) up to a relatively large scale (e.g., many sites across an entire ecoregion).

Some states now have formalized biological criteria, which requires water-bodies to attain certain numeric or narrative standards based on the aquatic community reference condition.


Chadwick Division representative project experience:

Arch Minerals, Kentucky

Temperature modeling of a stream and two tributaries in southern Kentucky, to determine the effects of a proposed coal strip mine on a resident trout population, specifically proposed canopy removal and the construction of sediment settling ponds. Collected site-specific inputs for USFWS instream temperature model (SSTEMP), including slope, aspect, vegetative canopy estimates, and established continuous recording temperature monitoring sites. Temperature changes were predicted using the SSTEMP temperature model on an annual basis, seasonal basis, and worst case scenario, and correlated with population data and species temperature tolerances to predict impacts.

 

Newmont Mining Company /  Resurrection Mining, Colorado

Continued seasonal monitoring of benthic invertebrate populations, and annual monitoring of fish populations and fish habitat quality for sites in the upper Arkansas River / California Gulch drainage near Leadville, Colorado.

 

Thompson Creek Mining Company, Idaho

Molybdenum mine along two tributaries of the Salmon River in central Idaho. Collect and process biological samples from stations on Thompson and Squaw Creeks, tributaries of the Salmon River, for an annual biological monitoring program. This long-term monitoring program of fish and invertebrate populations was initiated in 1980 and has continued to present.